Landscape’s Influence: An Interview with Kathy Fagan

Landscape’s Influence: An Interview with Kathy Fagan

by Sean Karns

Kathy Fagan is the author of four books of poems: The Raft (Dutton, 1985), a National Poetry Series selection; Moving & St Rage (Univ. of North Texas Press, 1999), winner of the Vassar Miller Prize for Poetry; The Charm (Zoo Press, 2002), and Lip (Eastern Washington Univ. Press, 2009). She is a professor of English at Ohio State University, where she co-edits The Journal.

Sean Karns: How has moving to the Midwest changed your perspective? And how has it influenced your poetry?

Kathy Fagan: I lived many places growing up and going to school, so it wasn’t a shock to move to the Midwest. I grew used to reserving judgment, and just went where I had to go for my family or for my education and, later, for my own jobs. What was shocking were the circumstances under which I was suddenly, being fully employed, able to live when I moved to central Ohio. In a house, for example. A large 130-year-old former farmhouse, a house that was in many ways the house I wished I’d grown up in. And the house was in a small town north of Columbus, which was also, for me, a native New Yorker, enormously weird and appealing. I got to playhouse really, attending the neighborhood movie theater for a couple bucks a show, eating in the neighborhood burger and beer joint for cheap, going to the county fair, etc. I lived in that house for sixteen years, longer than I’ve ever lived anywhere. I wrote about it in the new book, Lip, in a poem called “Nostophobia.” I love that house as if it were a person, and when I left it I knew I could never go back. Maybe that’s one way that the Midwest has changed my perspective: the land is flat, you can see the horizon everywhere. I’ve become someone for whom a tree or a hill or a house can be seen as a singular significant entity. Anything of beauty can flare up and throttle you: a cardinal in snow, sycamore trees in sunlight, a redbud in bloom, a child in her father’s arms. They’re all set off in high relief in the Midwest. Likewise, I look to poems, and to my own poems in particular, for something decidedly unflat: music, energetic syntax, images that radiate outward, creating light and shadow and color; I try to shape lines that will make a composition vivid, to use language that allows for emotional complexity and permits aural/oral pleasures simultaneously. Maybe I’d require all that of poems if I lived in Hawaii or Paris instead of here, but I don’t think I’m overstating landscape’s influence on one’s work and life.

SK: Do you think that the Midwest has a distinct aesthetic?

KF: I don’t have any freakin’ idea. I’ve lived here for nearly twenty years and I’m still surprised every day by it. What I think is that, on the one hand, the Midwest is one of the least provincial places I’ve ever lived. I think it’s a good place to make art—or to be a reader or writer or stilt-dancer or whatever—because nobody cares, and if they do they don’t mention it. I’ve never met people who keep to themselves as much as Midwesterners do. There’s a national perception that the Midwest is a place where it’s still the 1950s, that people go to church on Sundays and vote Republican and drive American-made cars and have abysmal eating habits; there’s some truth to that. But I have also met the most progressive and eccentric and creative people in Ohio and the Midwest, people who lead interesting lives, people who work hard and live fruitfully.

All that said, I’m not sure there is, beyond the Protestant plainness and simplicity one sees in the buildings and homes of Midwestern cities and towns, an aesthetic. I think most Midwesterners would scoff at the notion of aesthetics. It used to pain me that Columbus, for instance, wasn’t more forward-thinking about saving its landmarks and historical sites. It worries me that we don’t have a lightrail, that we build shit-malls and shit-houses where there once were natural habitats for deer and owls. There’s plenty that’s butt-ugly around here, but I’ve seen butt-ugly everywhere. We live in a climate of disposability, in this country and others, and in a disposable society the word “aesthetic,” if it exists at all, is an extremely fluid word at best, corrupt at worst. The Midwest has a little bit of an inferiority complex, I think. I think it feels insecure. When it quits feeling second- or third-best, and I think it is, slowly, doing that, it will flourish as a green, intellectual, and artistic part of the country. For my part, I see incredibly diverse work being written across the Midwest, by natives and non-natives alike. It would feel wrong to try to group that work under the heading of a single controlling aesthetic or sensibility.

SK: How would you characterize your poetry?

KF: I don’t characterize my poetry. I don’t subscribe to schools or categories or movements. I love to read poems that wake me to something in myself. I hope I write that kind of poem for other readers.

SK: Do you find any pattern ideas recurring in your poetry?

KF: I see patterns of thought and image echoed and expanded on in the poems, if not actual ideas. And some poetic obsessions or fetishes recur, of course. In the new book, Lip, I extend my ongoing work with persona, which I’ve been interested in for over twenty-five years. Maybe it’s the frustrated novelist in me, maybe it’s the fact that a single point of view never satisfies me, maybe it’s a love of voice, of many voices, that continues to motivate me to find those poems to write. I think, looking over the past four books and now into the fifth, that persona and structure, the voice speaking the poem and the vessel in which the spoken word is delivered, are absolutely central to my project, so if that’s the kind of pattern you’re talking about, well then, it’s there in spades. Making a song of a poem is more important to me than making a story. I wish for the music and texture of the language to say as much as the sentences do. And I do so love sentences and all they’re capable of, but I love the line even more. Littler fetishes of mine include the alphabet, the dictionary, the Bible, the saints, field guides, graveyards, a handful of artists, and miniatures of all kinds, which explains my affinity for children and birds.

SK: How do you manage being the poetry editor of The Journal, teaching, and writing?

KF: In the past it seemed to me that teaching and editing and life in general always came before writing. In as much as humanly possible, that is no longer true for me. I try to put writing first now, and sometimes I succeed. I started teaching to pay the rent and quickly discovered that I became invested in my students, in their lives and their learning processes. As a student myself, I worked on literary magazines and realized that that, in addition to teaching, was the best way for me to interact with other poets. I’m not much of a social butterfly, so engagement with poets in the classroom and in magazine correspondence are the primary ways I meet poets and get to know their work. I’ve made more friends over the years through teaching and The Journal than I ever did in writing programs, at conferences, or at colonies. But that’s another subject altogether. My point is that the three activities, teaching, editing, and writing, have become very interconnected, especially in the past ten years or so. At worst, I can feel like a poetry machine, churning forward for no good reason; at best, like someone who’s holding a little lantern in the dark. But I can’t imagine not writing, teaching, and editing—I wouldn’t refuse some time off, but I think the balance is just about as right as I can get it at this moment.

______

Sean Karns’s poetry has appeared or is forthcoming in RATTLE, Pleiades, Los Angeles Review, Cold Mountain Review, Folio, Mayday Magazine, and elsewhere.  His chapbook, Witnessing the World (New American Press), will be released in late 2012.

[The above interview was originally published by Ninth Letter and is reprinted here with permission of the author.]

Mahmoud Abbas’s Speech at the UN

Mahmoud Abbas’s Speech at the UN

by Karim Abuawad



Despite the fact that I was never a supporter of the Palestinian Authority, I have to say that I was very impressed with President Mahmoud Abbas’s speech at the UN last Friday. Granted, the Palestinian UN bid for statehood and Abbas’s speech will yield few tangible results on the ground. Life in Palestine will change little: the roadblocks will remain, the illegal settlements will continue to grow, eating up the land of the future Palestinian state, and the Israeli government, with the help of a right-wing, extremist Knesset, will continue issuing racist laws designed to make life harder than it already is for Palestinians.

This gloomy assessment, however, should in no way obscure the importance of Abbas’s speech and the PA’s UN bid for statehood. The importance of the speech has nothing to do with emotions or sentimentality. In addition to calling Obama’s bluff on his support for the establishment of a Palestinian state, Abbas, through a well-crafted speech, has also signaled a change in the terms of reference. For the first time in two decades (since the ill-fated Oslo Accords), Abbas has talked about a struggle against an aggression that lasted for 63 years (since 1948) rather than a struggle against an occupation that lasted for 44 years (since 1967). One of the things the Oslo Accords is criticized for is its erasure of the ethnic cleansing that took place in 1948 (see Ilan Pappe’s The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine), the results of which are still evident in refugee camps in several countries as well as in the occupied West bank and Gaza Strip. The Oslo Accords failed to address this key question because they were written as if nothing had happened before 1967. Abbas chose to bring up this critical question, while reminding his audience at the UN General Assembly that he himself was a victim of this ethnic cleansing when his family was forced to leave the costal city, Jaffa. He also reminded his audience that Palestinians have already compromised when they accepted the premise of peace in exchange for a state on the land occupied in 1967. How can they be asked to make more compromises? How can they be accused of being so stubborn as to refuse to compromise?

When it was the turn for the Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu to address the General Assembly, the concrete terms of reference outlined by Abbas were countered by an interesting assortment of Biblical stories and a genealogy of ancient names. In an op-ed piece in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Gideon Levy wrote that

The world and the auditorium cheered for Abbas because he spoke like a 21st-century statesman, not like a co-opted archaeologist of centuries past. Abraham or Ibrahim, Hezekiah or Netanyahu, Benjamin or Jacob-Israel, Jew or Judea – our prime minister’s Bible and Holocaust stories should have made Israelis sitting down to their Friday night dinner feel awkward and uncomfortable.

Of course, not all Palestinians admired Abbas’s speech or supported the UN bid. The crowds that cheered for him upon his return to Ramallah and the news coverage that constantly talk about the “surge” in Abbas’s popularity should not fool anybody into believing that all Palestinians now wholeheartedly support the PA or the president. Some of the people in these crowds were civil servants who were dismissed early on the day of the president’s return in order to welcome him. Others were people who belong to the president’s political faction, and those are the people who are ready to show their support any day of the week.

The people who chose not show up for rallies because of their critical stance vis-à-vis the UN bid are taking all these developments with a grain of salt. Surely, they have all the right to question these new developments rather than participate in a fanfare before knowing what good this bid will bring them. Having said that, some of these critics have attacked, or even mocked, the UN bid either on the grounds of their distrust of anything the PA engages in, or on the grounds of legal concerns, claiming that the bid will ultimately compromise the right of return of Palestinian refugees because the state proposed is one on the 1967 borders while most refugees were expelled from the part of historical Palestine on which Israel was established in 1948.

While not qualified to comment on the legal concerns, which might, after all, be valid, I can comment on the reactions of the people who oppose anything the PA proposes, often without truly evaluating the PA’s actions. It goes without saying that it’s important to have people around who never sing the praises of those in power and instead take them to task. However, the criticism of the PA’s bid which I heard over the past few days doesn’t fall into this category. Calling Abbas’s speech a publicity stunt, or accusing him of “riding the wave” of the Arab Spring can hardly be considered credible critique. At the end of the day, the bid and Abbas’s speech showed us that the world still supports the Palestinian cause, that the “international community” isn’t made up of only the US and Western Europe, that Palestinians are indeed capable of saying No to the US administration, and that if Palestinian are determined to stand by their principles, they will find out that the free people of the world will stand with them. This isn’t an overdone sentimentality; it is the truth that was expressed through the 15 standing ovations that president Abbas received at the General Assembly.

Chasing the Hare

by Raul Clement

[Author’s note: This story originally appeared in the Spring 2011 issue of Blue Mesa Review. You can purchase the issue here.]

The turnpike’s crowded come Thanksgiving, so at first Dylan doesn’t notice her, the new girl at the Northside McDonalds. Then the traffic breaks and he catches purple glimpses of her, a body bobbing among the waves. He hasn’t spoken to a real woman in so long he wonders if he remembers how. His last girlfriend, right before he dropped out of college, had accused him of cowardice, of running away. He can still see her getting into her car and pulling slowly out of the parking lot, daring him to run after her, to say, Wait, I was wrong. It’s okay. But he hadn’t, and now here he is, watching a girl on the other side of the turnpike.

One thing he’s learned: Southside and Northside don’t mix. It sounds like a bad show tune, but it’s true. Only a hundred feet of shimmering blacktop separate them, but it’s a five mile drive, heavily tolled, to the nearest turnabout. You could walk across, of course, but he’s seen too many rabbits paralyzed in headlights, too many bucks dragged bleeding hundreds of yards, ragged fur and antler smeared across the median. No one’s forded it yet, the Great Tollbooth River.

The air’s bone dry, the sky a chalky blue, and the leaves are rattling from their branches—so why the raincoat? She’s pulled the purple thing so tight the hood shadows her face. It hides the maroon and gold button-up, but he’s sure she’s a newbie. Just look at how she scrutinizes her watch, how her glance darts to the bright-lit windows of the store, as if expecting someone to come out and reprimand her at any minute. After a moment she hops from the car and slips off her hood. She shakes out a head of rich, auburn curls that goes tumbling down her back. She slips on her visor and disappears inside.

In the kitchen, Francisco’s struggling with a vat of last week’s fryer oil, a difficult task for a one-armed man. Some sloshes on the floor, and Rainbow leaps back and hops on one foot, pretending to be horribly burnt. Rainbow is a ninety-five pound transvestite with a piercing through her labret. Somehow, she’s neither convincing as a woman nor a man.

“Want to give me a hand?” Francisco asks Dylan. He waves the exposed stump of his arm, which if Rita were here, she would say constitutes a serious health code violation. Rainbow gives a snort of high-pitched laughter and then goes back to cleaning the grill. It’s down time, or as much of it as they get anyway, between the lunch and dinner rush.

Dylan grabs one side of the bucket and they haul it out the back door, where there’s pair of steel drums designed especially for old grease, collected by the county once a month. Dylan doesn’t know how they dispose of it once it’s in their possession, and he doesn’t want to know. He peeks around the corner, hoping to catch a glimpse of the Northside girl, but there’s only a long line of cars, creeping toward the drive-through window. The stars are coming out.

***

“I had a dream I was a balloon,” Francisco is saying. It’s the following day, around four p.m. “I filled up with air and I floated high above the trees, looking down at you all. It all seemed so laughable, you know? All the things we worry and stress about. Nothing.”

Rainbow is nodding sagely. Last night she had her left breast tattooed, and she rubs it gingerly as Francisco talks. She showed them it this morning—a grinning rabbit with half of its skin flayed off, in honor of her first pet, who was struck dead on this very turnpike. Dylan doesn’t know which is more horrifying, the tattoo or Rainbow’s breast.

“I’m going for a smoke,” he says.

He’s halfway through his second cigarette before the girl steps outside, in the same purple rain coat. She looks about, as if to make sure she isn’t being watched. Once again, she takes a seat on the hood of her car, and reaching into the pocket of the raincoat, digs out a brown paper bag, unwraps a sandwich. She swallows it in slow, thoughtful bites. It’s only her second day and already she’s bringing homemade food. She glances up and smiles at him—at least he thinks it’s at him. From this distance it’s hard to be sure.

***

Dylan began working at the Southside McDonalds as a college junior, with only thirty credit hours left and the full intention of completing a degree, but his father had taken longer dying than expected, and after the chemo, the hospital and the cremation, there wasn’t any money left. Dylan Sr. was a bookie, placing bets at Langston Hughes Memorial Greyhound track down in Loveland, and for a while it had been a decent living. Problem was, he couldn’t help placing his own wagers and he winded up owing some connected types. They let him live, but he never was the same afterward. It was only a couple of months later that he found the lump at the base of his skull.

“These types of tumors can affect decision making,” the doctor told Dylan. With Dylan’s mother gone, there was no one else to tell. “Have you noticed anything erratic in his behavior?”

You mean like gambling your life away? Dylan thought.

His lawyer wanted to sue, but by then Dylan Sr. was terminally depressed and could summon enthusiasm only for high-speed car chases on TV. He recorded these chases and watched them repeatedly, with same lost gleam in his eyes each time, though he already knew the outcome. It took him back to the Loveland, he said, to the “flesh and bone” excitement of a group of long-limbed Greyhounds tearing around the track, pounding down the dirt, in pursuit of the ever-elusive hare.

“Dogs teach a man to live,” he told Dylan. He took a drag of his cigar and doubled over, coughing woundedly. The chesnut-brown wig slipped from his skull, revealing a shiny, birthmarked pate. “How to chase the hare. You’ve got to chase the hare, or else why are you here?”

***

The next afternoon, same purple slicker, only this time it’s raining. Muddy gray water beats down in great, whipping sheets. Lights on the interstate move by in a swimmy dream. He waves to her and she waves back. He waves again, this time more vigorously. Then, inspired, he climbs into his car and switches on the lights. He flashes the only Morse Code he knows—SOS, the international call for help. She appears to smile—again, difficult to say—and points to her chest. I, or me. She holds up two fingers. I…peace? No. Me too—a fellow passenger in need.

Inside, Dylan works the register, a cush job offered to senior employees. People come at him in steady file, a wall of smooth, featureless masks, shouting orders at him over the hiss of burgers cooking, the gurgling of the fryer, the tinny crackle of voices from the drive-through speaker. Two children, one in a plastic cowboy hat, tear around the dining area, ducking under booths and climbing on tables. Normally he might have a word with their parents, but this time he leaves it to Rita, who comes huffing out of the back room, her hair in a net and her eyes rimmed red from crying. Rita’s got problems of her own, a boyfriend who left her for their salsa dancing instructor, and a kidney that won’t excrete. Her doctor recommended salsa dancing as a kind of natural therapy, and now he’s been added to her list, along with the salsa instructor and a score of others, of people she secretly wants to kill. The list is posted in her office, scrawled in big blue Sharpie and titled just that—People I Secretly Want to Kill. Dylan asked her about it once—“If you post it like that, how is it secret?”—but she just stared at him in a way that made him wonder if he was next on the list.

As Rita takes the parents aside, delicately explaining the situation, Dylan presses numbers and colored buttons on the cash register as if in a trance. A shadow of a smile plays about his lips.

“Who’s your new girlfriend?” Francisco whispers in his ear. He’s clutching a hundred-count bag of Chicken Nuggets, which he prepares to dump into the fryer. “Does she dig on onesies?” He nods at his stump.

“I don’t know what you’re talking about,” Dylan replies.

***

The next day he doesn’t work, but the following day is clear and sparkling, one of those autumn afternoons where the light comes in slanted and bright. Yesterday, he journeyed to the all night Wal-Mart in Loveland, passing the Langston Hughes track. Without quite realizing what he was doing, he doubled back and pulled into the dark parking lot. He sat on his hood for a while and stared at the closed gates, not really thinking of much. The structure seemed smaller, less stately and more decrepit, than when his father used to work there.

Langston Hughes was an avid fan of Greyhound racing, and it is said that as a young man he spent an entire afternoon at the Loveland track, placing one grand wager after another. At the time the track had been named for Walter Schultz, the shipping magnate who’d funded its construction. That afternoon, Mr. Hughes won only a single bet, but he never stopped laughing uproariously, flushed and drunk in the August heat, a slender beauty at his side. Or so this is what Dylan’s father told him as a boy. Now he’s not so sure if he believes it—not because it’s unbelievable, but because it was his father saying it.

From a large plastic bag, Dylan removes a neon-green Frisbee, a roll of Scotch tape, a pen and a yellow legal pad. Bent over the sun-warmed hood of his car, he scribbles one word: Hey. The girl watches him curiously. He tears off a length of tape, then another, and affixes the paper to the Frisbee. He waits for a breath in the traffic, and then casts the Frisbee powerfully. It sails over the highway, wobbling gently to the weedy edge of the lot. The girl walks, not too slowly but not too fast, to pick it up. She reads the note. She studies him for a moment, face obscured by the glare of the lowering sun. She reaches inside her car, finds a pen, and removing the cap with her teeth, pauses for a long time, considering what to write. She puts down something, then seems to think better of it, crosses it out. She balls up the piece of paper and begins anew. Then, taking a running start, she launches the Frisbee back across, her whole body twisting in the attempt. The disc doesn’t quite make it, rolling to a stop two lanes in, where it is swept under the grill of a passing pickup. Miraculously, it reappears unscathed. Dylan darts out to retrieve it.

“Hey,” the message reads.

He thinks for a minute. “What’s your name?” he writes. He flings the Frisbee back across the turnpike in a wide arc that sails just clear of the parking lot. It bounces through high grass, into a ditch of knotted brambles. She retrieves it and holds it up with a triumphant grin. In a moment, the disc comes soaring back across.

“Carmen Ríos,” it says. Or maybe Caren Rios. But what kind of name is Caren? He finds it interesting that’s she written her full name. She’s one of those girls who draws hearts over her I’s, which normally irks him, but here seems endearing. “Dylan Broderick,” he writes, and then in a bold flurry, “Where are you from? How old are you? What do you hope to do with your life?” He worries this last is too heavy and vague, as if the Frisbee might buckle under its weight. But the reply comes quick and unmeditated: Chicago; twenty-two (one year younger than him); and Play Frisbee on the Turnpike with a Cute Boy.

“It’s looks like you’ve already found happiness,” he writes. “An enviable lot. Hopefully someone matching that description will come along soon.”

“I’m not picky,” she writes. “See you.” He watches her run back inside, curls swaying as she goes.

***

In the insular world of Greyhound racing, a dog that catches the hare is known as a “dealbreaker.” Greyhounds are sprinters, and as such are easily winded; they do not race more than once in a day. Once a dog sinks its jaws into the stuffing of the admittedly very fake rabbit, the race is over and no winner can officially be declared. Money must be gathered and redistributed. Drunk and inveterate gamblers are a raucous and impatient lot. They clamor and bang on the booths, one small spark shy of riotous. The glass of the booths is bulletproof, but it’s no match for an angry mob. Dylan’s father had braved their wrath several times in his career, and once he’d had to be hospitalized for a couple of bruised ribs and a sprained wrist. He’d called out the riot guard on that one, and they’d swarmed in with tear gas, mace, and shiny black sticks.

“No one likes a dealbreaker,” Dylan Sr. told his son when he came to visit him in the hospital.He had asked about Dylan’s girlfriend, and Dylan had confessed that she’d left him. “I always thought that she was too much for you. Hard-nosed.”

Like Mom? Dylan thought.

This was just a few months after Dylan’s mother had left him for a chiropractor in Des Moines, but Dylan now believes she was on her way out long before that, tired of the four A.M. knocks on the door, the hushed conferences out in the hall, the women who’d corner her in the grocery store, begging Dylan Sr. to call his henchmen off, saying that their husbands needed one lucky break, just one, and then they’d settle up. Of course, the break never came and soon enough those same henchmen came for Dylan Sr. Claudia left him for a man of earnest principle and steady income. Several months later, a postcard arrived at their door. The postcard showed the shimmering wheat fields of Des Moines, rippling in the wind, a sky blue water tower floating balloonlike in the background. The postcard had no return address and only one word on the reverse side: dealbreaker.

***

“Will you come out with me this Sunday?” Dylan’s most recent note said. She simply smiled and nodded, and the knowledge of this date was enough to carry him buoyant through a week of staff meetings (they weren’t pushing the McRib hard enough, and don’t forget the holiday specials), nonplussed customers, corporate scandal (someone had lifted five grand from the Lexington branch, an inside job if there ever was one), and long lines of screaming children. He felt a bit like Francisco, way up in his dream balloon.

When the day finally arrives, they meet at exit 127, five miles south of the Northside McDonalds. She is waiting for him at the travel plaza, leaning against her car in a yellow sundress. The dress’s pleats whip about her ankles. Her toes are squeezed into high-heeled, red leather boots. She must be freezing, Dylan thinks, and suddenly feels embarrassed to be seen in his faded Army jacket and frayed jeans. Should have combed my hair, he thinks. She is wearing the purple rain slicker, as always.

“You know it’s not raining, right?” Dylan says by way of greeting. “I’ve been meaning to ask you that.”

She nods. “But it might start any minute.”

“An optimist.”

“My grandmother always used to say that if you have low expectations you won’t be disappointed,” she says. “She raised me.”

“Sounds like a wonderful woman.”

***

The race track, exposed at its northern opening, is buffeted by a hard-edged Canadian wind. In a fit of chivalry, he offers her his jacket, which she accepts, draping it over her knees. He shivers uncontrollably but makes no complaint. It turns out her name is Caren after all, pronounced with a Latin-sounding A.

She has bet on the last place dog. “If it wins, I’m rolling. If not—well, I didn’t expect it to anyway.”

“I suppose I’m conservative,” he says. “I never thought of myself that way.” He has placed a bet on Firefly, a dog whose name sounds fast and whose odds are sufficiently low—six-to-one—for a substantial payoff, but sufficiently high to seem judicious.

“So listen,” she says. “There’s something I should tell you.”

“Yeah?” He waits for her to speak, but then she grabs his arm and points out to the track. The race is about to start. It’s the first time she’s touched him.

There’s a sharp whistle, and then the short, dry pop of the starting gun. The dogs come roiling out of their gates in a skirt of dust, and as the yellow cloud settles you can see their lean, silvery muscles stretched taut, their combed heads thrust from long necks swollen with cords, their small paws scuttling for purchase in the dirt. The crowd is on their feet. At first the dogs are nearly even, and it’s anybody’s race, but then one gray and blue-spotted beast, the smallest and scruffiest of the lot, noses ahead. And incredibly, it’s Blue Angel, Caren’s pick, who edges around the second bend, just twenty yards behind the steady bobbing of the hare. The great crane arm yanks the stuffed rabbit around the track, and Caren is jumping in her seat, Dylan’s coat falling forgotten on the dirty, soda-puddled ground. She clutches his hand and looks at him more closely than anyone ever has, he thinks. Then she returns to the race, clapping and cheering herself hoarse. It’s the last lap and it doesn’t seem possible but there it is: with one final, heroic lunge, Blue Angel crosses the finish line mere inches in front of the first place pick, Remember the Alamo. A groan arises in the crowd, most of whom have made safer picks, like Dylan. Firefly finishes several lengths behind. They go to pick up her winnings. She counts through the money again and again, as if she can’t believe it’s real. It’s more than she makes in a week, if she gets paid anything like him. Afterwards they stand at his car, reluctant to let the moment pass. He’s about to suggest that they get a drink somewhere—to celebrate her win, just like his father did the rare times he won—but she speaks first.

“I’m married,” she tells him. “That was what I wanted to tell you.”

***

For the next two days, no messages pass between them, and he works in a fog of misery and doubt. He goes drinking after work with Francisco, Rainbow, and one of the fry cooks. Rainbow takes them to a Tranny bar in downtown Levinston, where the bass thumps loud and low, and shirtless men in leather pants gyrate in an ecstasy-induced sweat. There is cage with a live Bengal tiger in it. The tiger, bored by the whole scene, stretches out languidly, licking his paws with a distracted air.

On the third day, the Frisbee floats lazily into view. He reads her note. “Are you mad at me?”

“No,” he replies, and then as an afterthought, a postscript, “I don’t know.”

“It’s not a happy marriage,” she writes. “He’s on the way out, I promise. His name’s Lewis and he’s a knife salesman. He’s always trying to get me to stand still so he can practice knife-throwing tricks on me. Once, he cut off the tip of my ear.”

“I don’t want to hear about it,” Dylan writes.

“Then you don’t want to know me.”

A schoolbus passes between them, creaking in its axles, a dozen small children mashing their faces curiously against the windows. Dylan goes back inside.

***

The next day, he takes his cigarette break out back, by the grease drums. When it comes time for lunch, he sits at a corner booth wedged between the drink machine and the bathroom. There’s a lot of commotion here—the rattle of ice cubes in plastic cups, the whoosh of flushing toilets—and the occasional waft of shit and piss mixed with antisepctic tablets whenever the bathroom doors swing open. But he feels secure in his corner, away from the window. He’s brought a book—on the history of greyhound racing, as if to torture himself—but the truth is he mostly stares at the page, unable to concentrate.

Three days go by like this, but it feels like an eternity, a geologic amount of time. After every shift, when he emerges into the cold November night, he’s almost surprised to discover that life continues unabated, shameless. He expects a wasteland, overrun by vegetation and huge reptilian birds. But cars rush by and people emerge from the glowing façade of Northside. He hurries to his car to avoid seeing her.
After a few days, she calls. He’s half asleep and he answers without thinking. “I want to talk to you,” she says. “Can we meet somewhere?”

He hesitates, but says yes. They arrange an appointment at the coffee shop in the travel plaza where they’d met before. He wills himself to arrive late, but somehow shows up early anyhow. But there she is, even earlier, sitting inside. She’s taken off the purple slicker and draped it over the back of the chair. Her arms looks very pale in the harsh halogen light.

“Hi,” she says.

“Hi.”

He takes a seat and waits for her to speak. She shifts uncomfortably, coughs, then stares down into her coffee, where the cream has clouded the surface. She swirls the liquid with a stirrer and looks back up at him. “Aren’t you going to get something?” she says. “It feels weird, you watching me like that.”

“I don’t want anything.”

“Lewis has agreed to a divorce.”

“Okay.” He’s not going to give her the satisfaction of a reaction.

“Look,” she says, “I should have told you. I don’t know what I was thinking. I was scared you’d freak out.”

“Yeah.”

“Lewis and me—it’s complicated. Remember what I told you about my grandmother? Well, imagine growing up that way. Thinking you’re never going to get anything. That you don’t deserve it.”

He hates it when people do this, talk about their failings as if they were like the weather, outside of their control. It reminds him of his father, always blaming the dogs when he lost, telling himself that next time it would be better, next time his dog would come in. Never considering that it wasn’t simply bad luck that had put him where he was. Dylan stands. “I’ve got to go.”

She just nods and watches him leave, or so he imagines, though he doesn’t turn around. He wonders if she’ll just keep sitting there, drinking cup after cup, waiting for a moment that never comes. Let her wait, he thinks.

***

The weekend brings a dense, low-lying fog creeping from the marshy woods surrounding the highway. Traffic moves at an intermittent crawl, and there is news on the radio of delays and pileups, road closings and tollbooth robberies. Dylan calls in sick twice in a row, burying himself in bed with a pillow over his eyes. Dealbreaker, he keeps thinking, remembering the sharp, black letters, the way they rose menacingly from the blank postcard.

The next morning Dylan’s head is steady and calm. The anxieties of the week seem foolish, overwrought. He hurries to work, arriving fifteen minutes early. The fog is still rolling and mixing along the weed-choked shoulders of the highway. As he was hoping, she’s on break, eating another sandwich. The fog cuts ribbons around her. He sends the Frisbee sailing across—no note attached, the Frisbee alone is enough—and it disappears into thick, gray clouds.

SATURDAY POETRY SERIES PRESENTS: SARAH SHELLOW

by Sarah Shellow:

FULL MOON IN THE SUBURBS
For Gary Snyder

The full moon announces itself to this night
a specter chiseled by branches and leaves.
And the honeyed air loiters in the dark particles of day’s exhaustion,
remembering the difficult work of re-creation. 

How this suburb longs to be wild with the neighboring woods,
with slatted moonbeams drawn across its forested face. 

But these shiny lit facades of houses startled by street lamps
give us no place to
obscure ourselves.

Return, to masted quarry,
Reach, through obstructing leaves,
and feel the lick of this moon’s silvery tongue
cool your cheeks
hot from running
home.


DAY’S LINE OF REASONING

funny: The purple feather on my dash flew out the window. What do I know?

                  1. television:

                  The spicebush swallowtail caterpillar has false eyes

               you cannot tell when it is walking away 

               2. grocery:


               A bar code swiped

               identifies a package by its

               contents


               Who is there?



The cotton in my ears must have arrived in my sleep. I couldn’t hear by morning.


By midday, curious, the silence was louder than the noise of petals falling.


Dreamed pieces clack and slide in auricular tubing against hammer, anvil, stirrup


noise

no one can hear

but me


I took my knowing

down by the river,

washed it, and let it go


3. she hung in silks across my path

tangled and free,

like me,

not you.

me.


breakfast: it was too late to eat dinner, so I ate breakfast.


no margarine


               4. a sunrise.



(Today’s poems appear here today with permission from the poet.)


Sarah Shellow lives in Bethesda, Maryland. Her short fiction, short stories, and reviews have appeared in The Pitkin Review and The Atticus Review. She was a critical commentary editor for The Pitkin Review and presently serves as an associate editor for the Potomac Review. She has taught creative writing for sixteen years to third grade through graduate-level students, and she works as a literacy educator for first-year public school teachers at Center for Inspired Teaching in Washington, D.C. She blogs at http://www.sarahshellow.blogspot.com.

Editor’s Note: When I sought out a submission for this series from Sarah Shellow, she sent me a wide array of poems. I read and re-read them. I vacillated. There were so many things I loved in each, yet each was so different. Should I share the more traditional poem or the more experimental? What do my readers want to be exposed to? In the end, I decided her work, and your eyes, deserved a sampling of both ends of the spectrum. With “Full Moon in the Suburbs,” the poet shares something more familiar in its style and use of imagery, and mirrors the layout and language of the poem with the subject matter itself. In “A Day’s Line of Reasoning” she treats us instead to an exploration of the other, in both the way the poem interacts with the page and in the varied, sometimes nonsensical narrative. I think, for a reader, it is important to be exposed to both, and that it is particularly interesting to see how one poet’s work can encompass such vast and varying planes.

Want to see more by and about Sarah Shellow?
Sarah Shellow Official Blog
The Atticus Review

Andreas Economakis

Mean

by Andreas Economakis

I’m mean.
I drop-kicked one stray cat,
flipped off a dozen motorists in one ride,
busted the tailight of a car,
left garbage at the end of the Kalalau trail,
pissed on the door of a 600 Benz.
laughed about it,
nearly got beat up because of it,
I broke a dozen good hearts,
lied when I was cornered,
stole a few dirty magazines,
buried them in odd places,
didn’t call my mom up for a decade,
ignored one important phone call,
tried to bury my head in the sand.

That stray cat sure deserved it.
He bit the shit out of my finger.

–Andreas Economakis

This piece is an attempt at poetry and part of a collection of words on blindness entitled: The Blindness of Life. The author is not a poet.

Copyright © 2011, Andreas Economakis. All rights reserved.

For more stories by Andreas Economakis click on the author’s name below.

SATURDAY POETRY SERIES PRESENTS: BILL RECTOR

BLACK BAG
by Bill Rector

Where, William Carlos Williams,
are your patients?

How in the world, the words,
did you escape

them? Erase
them? In

stanzas succinct
as prescriptions

wouldn’t a few
more fit? Between curved

blades of obstetric
forceps, the book of birth

and death certificates?
White as the door

are they still
there? Waiting

on the heart’s rapid knock,
the hoped-for answer?

Why is your first name
also your last?


(Today’s poem previously appeared in The Offending Adam and appears here today with permission from the poet.)


Bill Rector is a physician practicing in Denver whose poetry has been published in a variety of journals, including Field, Prairie Schooner, The Denver Quarterly, and Hotel Amerika. His book, bill, was published in 2006 by Proem Press.

Editor’s Note: Today’s post is dedicated to Jenny Stella, who, like Dr. Rector and William Carlos Williams, shares her life with both poetry and medicine. Having been at once a poet and a lawyer, I understand what it is to live a life that is both shared and divided in this way. Jenny Stella and I have spent many hours contemplating what it means to inhabit two demanding arenas in life; how an artist can give themselves fully to a professional practice, and how a professional can give enough of themselves to their art. What today’s poem explores is where the medicine itself shows, or does not show, its face in poetry.

Want to see more by and about Bill Rector?
Proem Press
Bill Rector is Poetry Editor of The Yale Journal for Humanities in Medicine
Buy Bill Rector’s book, bill

SATURDAY POETRY SERIES PRESENTS: JILLIAN WEISE


HERE IS THE ANGER ANDREW ASKED FOR*
by Jillian Weise

when he gave me the latest issue of P-Queue.
“I want the poems where you’re angry,”

he said. I read the magazine and I can tell
I’m not his type. What a luxury it must be

to not need sense. It must be like you already
have your civil rights and at least one friend

to call when your leg dies, except wait . . .
your leg never dies, does it?

Your leg never loses a charge. Last week
a girl, fifteen, in Abercrombie & Fitch

was thrown out because she has cerebral
palsy and her sister went in the dressing

room to help her try on a pair of jeans and
that’s against store policy.

If I wanted to write the poem for P-Queue,
I’d write it like this—

a dressing room / a girl / a sister
a try on / a messed up / thrown out
() () () () () () () () () () () () () () () ()
with Fitch / in against / its clothes
Abercrombie body / of was to
help her

–and while I agree the last line is not bad,
is that because it makes sense?

And do you think I’m naive for wanting
store policy change through poetry?

If not change, then just one electrical socket
attached by wire to one charger glowing

green attached by wire to one girl’s leg
(it doesn’t have to be my leg)

in at least one poem in the English language?
Look. The girl with her leg plugged in.

She’s in a poem now. She must exist.
The girl from the Abercrombie news clip

is not that store’s type. Maybe because
that girl never existed in a poem.

She hasn’t been poetry’s type. But I’m not
angry, Andrew. This isn’t anger.

This is a debate. I didn’t get angry until
I read just now in P-Queue this poem

by Divya Victor:

“When the thighs are taken away, one is stumped. One can only / totter away; a stumbledum, a tumbler brimming with demand. / Dimly, one is the witnesses to an / uroboric outpour of bored / bodies. Herein, the harkening of the sound of knock-kneed,
one-legged pirating of a floor plan drawn to the scale of the / bourgeois body.”

Andrew—What is this? Did you pick it?
Am I a stumbledum? Will you ask Divya

if she thinks I’m a stumbledum? Here is this
from Divya’s Artist Statement

on the site Just Buffalo: “To write poetry
[…] is to accept our responsibilities of

making possible positive change.” Is this
positive change, Andrew? Divya?

_____

* This poem was accepted for publication by Andrew Rippeon while he was editor of P-Queue. He discussed the poem with Divya Victor who wanted to write a response. Months later, the poem was dropped for publication.


Jillian Weise is the author of the poetry collection The Amputee’s Guide to Sex (Soft Skull Press, 2007) and the novel The Colony (Counterpoint/Soft Skull Press, 2010). Her work was selected for the film series Poetry Everywhere, produced by PBS and the Poetry Foundation. Her essay, “Going Cyborg,” appeared in The New York Times. Recent work is forthcoming in the anthology Beauty Is a Verb: The New Poetry of Disability. Occasionally, she makes movie poems. (Today’s poem originally appeared in the first issue of the brand new journal Catch Up and is reprinted by permission of the poet.)

Editor’s Note: Recently I’ve been thinking about poetry that is doing something larger than itself. Poetry that matters beyond its beautiful language, music, and imagery. Today’s entry in this series is just such a poem. With “Here Is the Anger Andrew Asked For,” and the background and dialogue that have become a part of the poem itself, Weise is speaking up and out for what she as an artist and a human believes in. Her politics about disability, and her disagreement with some other poets about the use of degrading imagery around disability, become a part of the life of the poem itself. By pushing onward and getting the word out there about her battle, Weise is using poetry to reach off the page, beyond the world of art, and into a larger, more meaningful dialogue.

Want to see more by and about Jillian Weise?
The Colony
The Amputee’s Guide to Sex
Beauty Is a Verb: The New Poetry of Disability

SATURDAY POETRY SERIES PRESENTS: EDGAR RINCÓN LUNA

THE ENCLOSURE
By Edgar Rincón Luna
Translation by Anthony Seidman

At a certain moment
after having left home
you thought that you had forgotten something
an object
something uncertain
and that it was necessary to turn back

Once in particular
while in the middle of childish games and glee
a word took you by surprise
and you turned your gaze elsewhere in search of it

Then with undeniable fear
a voice surprised you while you spoke
another voice
simple another

And when the vast and
traversable night offered herself to you
you became aware how
between the dust and the city
for us
poetry was building an enclosure


EL CERCO
Por Edgar Rincón Luna
En el español original

En algún momento
después de haber salido de casa
pensaste que algo se te había olvidado
un objeto
algo desconocido
y que era necesario regresar

Alguna vez
en medio del juego infantil y la risa
una palabra te tomó por sorpresa
y volviste tus ojos a otro sitio buscándola

Entonces entre el miedo innegable
una voz te soprendió mientras hablabas
otra
simplemente otra

Y cuando la noche se te ofreció vasta
recorrible
te diste cuenta
de cómo entre el polvo y la ciudad
la poesía se nos fue levantando un cerco


(Today’s poem is taken from the collection Aquí empieza la noche interminable (Tierra Adentro; Mexico City). Different versions of today’s poem appeared in Hunger Magazine (2003) and The Bitter Oleander (2010). “El Cerco” and this translation appear here today with permission from both the poet and the translator.)


Edgar Rincón Luna is a poet from Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. He is the author of several collections including Aquí empieza la noche interminable (Tierra Adentro) and Puño de Whiskey (Ediciones sin nombre). His poetry has appeared in dozens of journals in Mexico, Spain, and the United States, including Reverso, Beyond Baroque, Hunger, and The Bitter Oleander.

Editor’s Note: Inherent in the words, imagery, and meter of today’s poem, simplicity dances with vastness in a way that at once lulls me and keeps me alert. Simple, elegant, beautiful; culminating in a final stanza that is as lovely and evanescent as the dust it’s built upon.

Want to see more by and about Edgar Rincón Luna?
las afinidades electivas / las elecciones afectivas

ART

Photograph of Keegan McHargue, 2011, by Graeme Mitchell.

KEEGAN MCHARGUE, THE PERIPATETIC ARTIST RETURNS TO S.F.

by Matt Gonzalez

By the age of 21, Keegan Mchargue was already being feted as an important emerging artist to watch. Debut solo shows in New York in 2003 at the Wrong Gallery and Rivington Arms followed group shows in various cities including New York (Deitch Projects), Los Angeles (Roberts and Tilton), and San Francisco (Luggage Store). If this wasn’t enough to stake his claim in the contemporary art scene, Mchargue was profiled in the prescient Wall Street Journal article “The 23-Year Old Masters” alongside artists Dash Snow, Ryan Trecartin, Rosson Crow and Zane Lewis, among others.

Subsequent shows with Emmanuel Perrotin (Paris), Jack Hanley (San Francisco), Hiromi Yoshii (Tokyo), Metro Pictures (New York), and Layr Wuestenhagen Contemporary (Vienna) all followed.

Mchargue’s  “Natural” marks his return to San Francisco as a seasoned artist ready to show that the promise critics recognized eight years ago has been realized, and his artistic vision has sustained beyond his youthful success.

Mchargue’s positive critical reception, has occurred in part, because he is emblematic of his generation in production, theme and concept. He exemplifies a new kind of artist who employs a kind of multitasking approach to synthesis and a kaleidoscopic penchant for changing forms and ordered randomness. This peripateticism blurs categorization and departs sharply from the single-concept-driven idea of exhibition, so common within the art world today.

Although firmly rooted in an aesthetic more closely associated with the Mission School, Mchargue is fascinated with the subconscious, and his work is as much about revealing himself and forcing the viewer to engage with his associations as it is about anything else.

The Surrealists also presented artworks as a manifestation of the subconscious, yet the work they made, while tapping into the unconscious mind, was subject to a psychoanalytic critique that accused it of being highly shaped and processed by the ego.

Juxtaposed against the unorganized instinctive drives and impulses of the subconscious, the ego represents the rational and organized aspects of personality. When present, it contains and boxes in the work of art and limits the kind of inquiry into personal subject areas an artist might otherwise attain.

Unconscious desires and concerns need a mechanism to break through repression. Mchargue attempts to overcome ego by simply taking from a disordered panoply of subject matter. The resulting work is filled with unexpected juxtapositions. Dismembered beings and leprechauns are followed by grid patterns and non-sequiturs.

Mchargue was raised in an artistic household. He has noted that his mother encouraged drawing exercises, such as drawing objects upside down and backwards.  During his obsessive art-making period, Mchargue believes he drew thousands of shoes.

When he paints today, Mchargue harvests these memories and mixes them with contemporary influences. He expresses the subconscious with fantastic imagery and incongruous pairings of subject matter.  His fascination with music, the act of painting with the television on, and his art-infused upbringing all compete as influences.

In some sense the work is an experiment in unfiltered material that simply flows together.  It is arresting because it tries to capture a car crash of ideas and images that smash into each other. The fetishization for multitasking and the production of kaleidoscopic forms underscore whimsy, randomness and the curious order that comes through synthesis.

Mchargue also enjoys removing objects from their natural landscape and placing them in a neutral or negative context to draw them out. By isolating and simplifying the object, he strips it to its essential details which allows the viewer to see it without distraction. At times he seems to place an object in a painting simply because there was space for it there.

The wandering nature of Mchargue’s influences also compels a comparison to the members of the Situationist International, particularly Raoul Vaneigem and Guy Debord.  While they rejected commercialism and would have likely objected to the use of Mchargue’s geometric grids, they do nevertheless have one point of comparison. Their concept of “the dérive,” or the drift, which dates to 1958, in effect was the exposition of psychogeographic method which culminated in explorations in a city with no predetermined purpose, a wandering much like Mchargue’s, although McHargue does it wandering within a mental landscape.

In a dérive one or more persons during a certain period drop their usual motives for movement and action, their relations, their work and leisure activities, and let themselves be drawn by the attractions of the terrain and the encounters they find there… But the dérive includes both this letting go and its necessary contradiction: the domination of psychogeographical variations by the knowledge and calculation of their possibilities.

Knabb, Ken, ed. Situationist International Anthology, Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, 1995. pg 50.

Mchargue’s work is authentically trying to rid itself of preconception and design. And Mchargue’s peripateticism is just that: the wandering mind of someone who manifests his thoughts on a surface, be it paper or canvas, or sculpture. The work is personal and idiosyncratic.  It doesn’t feel made for someone else. Rather, we are invited to eavesdrop on the wanderings he has undertaken, culminating in the finished canvas. His itinerant quality reaches for influences and references without regard to art historical appropriateness.

Matt Gonzalez is a collage artist, lawyer, and politician living in San Francisco.

This essay was first published in Keegan McHargue: Natural (SF: Frey Norris Contemporary & Modern, 2011)

Keegan McHargue: Natural
Frey Norris Contemporary & Modern
September 10 – October 29, 2011
Opening September 10 at 4:00pm to 7:00pm

Small Press Review Series: On Style, or the Natural Lack Thereof As its Own Kind of Style, in Danila Botha’s Got No Secrets

Got No Secrets
Danila Botha
Tightrope Books (2010), 141 pages, $18.95

Some writers are comfortable in a style the way that certain people are comfortable in their clothes. This is not to say that the chosen style is superior; rather, these writers wear their style without self-consciousness or preening. Their work is generally successful because it know its mind.

Danila Botha, author of the appropriately titled Got No Secrets, is one of those writers. With a ferocious punk energy, this first story collection turns over the secret soil of its characters’ hearts: young women struggling with drug habits, abusive relationships, and a tendency toward masochism and other compulsive behaviors. Punk rock haircuts, tattoos, and sexual promiscuity abound.

Here’s a sample passage:

I get that apartment and share it with Tina. I don’t officially drop out, I just stop going to class. I do it until I flunk out, and no one’s around to make me feel guilty. Tina’s strung out so often it’s like living alone. I look at her: bone thin where she once had boobs and hips, black mascara running down her face, her once perfect hair peroxide blond with roots. I wonder if she knows she’s a junkie. She has all these sexy clothes, but she doesn’t even get dressed anymore. She just uses and poses for our webcam. She inserts anything. I once saw her stick a stiletto heel up there.

A big part of readability is rhythm. Botha has a natural sense of rhythm’s nuances – when to linger on a detail or scene and when to breeze past in explication. Couple that with prose that doesn’t call attention to itself – either with self-consciously quirky detail (McSweeney’s), precocious and precious word choice (Nabokov), syntactical clutter (Pynchon), or affected lack of affect (Carver) – and you’ve got stories that, excuse the personification, read themselves. Though I am a painfully slow reader, I finished these twenty-pagers in the time it took to drink a cup of coffee.

At times the language is flat, but you barely notice. “Bone thin” and “peroxide blonde” in the above passage feel stock. Similarly, I wonder why a writer so interested in rubbing our faces in the dirt would employ a euphemism like “up there.” After watching this story’s narrator puke, use ecstasy, have sex with a stranger, and expose herself on webcam, this delicacy about genitalia feels prissy. But under the spell of Botha’s self-assuredness, we read right past it. It is only the critic in me that notices, and only then out of a sense of occupational duty.

Botha is a Canadian by way of South Africa, and she is at her most successful – for this American reader, at least – when she explores her South African roots. Here’s another passage, from the collection’s most successful piece, “Heroin Heights:”

The streets are lined with one-star hotels, street meat vendors, and magoshas getting ready to hlahla any guy desperate enough to pay them. Our apartment is on Claim Street, near Kotze, across the street from the infamous Protea Hotel. It’s legendary for the number of jijis, underage girls, that are there all the time…They all wear the same gold or purple eyeshadow, red lipstick, and black fishnets or torn tights…When they bend over you can see everything. No underwear.

This passage maintains the same naturalness of phrasing as the first. But it is superior in its specificity and rhetorical relationship to the reader. Perhaps the details would seem overly familiar if I were South African, but I am not, and I am guessing most of Botha’s audience is not either. Additionally, the narrator of this story is a young girl with kidney disease, and as we watch her mother struggle to pay for her daughter’s dialysis, our sympathy swells more easily than it does for the more self-afflicted characters of the other pieces. One of this collection’s biggest flaws, its lack of perspective and authorial distance, is absent here. I have no idea how autobiographical these stories are, but all but one are narrated by young females who live in either Canada or South Africa, and Botha seems to expect us to take their plights as seriously as they do. This is noble, but a little distancing irony – or at least some sense of how these women’s parents and boyfriends view them – might have gone a long way. “Heroin Heights” achieves this distance by situating its narrator in the larger social struggles of Johannesburg.

But this lack of distance is also the collection’s strength, a result of its stylistic ingenuousness. If at times this leads to repetitiveness (most of these stories are not just in first person, but also in present tense), a lack of structure (stories seem to begin and end without reason), or a borderline melodrama (nurses who cut themselves, women who can’t get over boyfriends of years prior), it also makes for an immersive read. Botha does well to sink us in subjectivity, but if she can offer a more objective look at that subjectivity’s context, while not losing sight of her essential Botha-ness, her stories will resonate more full and wide.